Statistical bulletin

Early conciliation and employment tribunal data for England, Scotland, and Wales: April to June 2024

Published

1. Main points

  • Open track group cases made up 40% of group cases in April to June 2024, falling from 49% in January to March 2024, but higher in comparison to 24% in October to December 2023, and 32% in July to September 2023.
  • Open track cases accounted for the largest number of individual cases between April and June with regards to employee-led early conciliation notification numbers, making up 36% of cases.
  • Standard track cases accounted for 68% of employer-led cases for April to June; this has decreased from 74% in January to March.
  • 68% of early conciliation notifications did not progress to employment tribunal between January to March 2024, remaining steady from the previous quarter.
  • Open track cases made up around 50% of employment tribunal claim form (ET1) receipts within each of the 5 quarters between April 2023 and June 2024.
  • 78% of employment tribunal cases received did not go on to have a hearing in April to June 2024, up slightly from 76% that was maintained across each of the 4 quarters between April 2023 to March 2024.

2. Early conciliation notifications

When an employee wants to make a claim against their employer at an employment tribunal, in most cases they must notify Acas first. Acas offers early conciliation to try to reach an agreement between the employee and employer and avoid the employee making a claim to an employment tribunal.

In some circumstances, the employer may approach Acas to help resolve a potential dispute. This can also be handled using early conciliation.

Early conciliation notifications can be made:

  • by an individual against their employer
  • on behalf of a group against their employer
  • by an employer where a dispute concerning staff requires resolution

Employee-led early conciliation notifications

Around 95% of all early conciliation notifications came from employees across each of the 5 quarters between April 2023 and June 2024.

Open track cases had the largest number of group cases with an assigned track in April to June 2024, accounting for 40%. This has decreased from 49% in January to March 2024. In comparison, group cases with no track assigned held the highest proportion of cases in October to December 2023, accounting for 33% of group cases.

Open track cases had the largest number of individual cases, accounting for 36% of all employee-led cases in April to June 2024. This is down slightly from 37% in January to March 2024 and October to December 2023, but an increase compared to 33% in both July to September 2023 and April to June 2023.

Table 1a: Fast track employee-led individual early conciliation cases from April 2023 to June 2024

Case type April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Individual 6,646 7,015 7,133 7,202 6,629 34,625
Group 238 144 141 219 193 935

Table 1b: Employee-led individual early conciliation cases from April 2023 to June 2024

Case type April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Individual 7,571 8,172 8,931 9,490 9,146 43,310
Group 99 128 130 309 197 863

Table 1c: Standard track employee-led individual early conciliation cases from April 2023 to June 2024

Case type April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Individual 4,345 4,636 5,078 5,420 5,110 24,589
Group 90 84 91 84 84 433

Table 1d: No assigned track employee-led individual early conciliation cases from April 2023 to June 2024

Case type April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Individual 4,554 4,766 3,287 3,712 4,666 20,985
Group 53 50 180 24 16 323

Table 1e: Total numbers of employee-led individual early conciliation cases from April 2023 to June 2024

  April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Individual 23,116 24,589 24,429 25,824 25,551 123,509
Group 480 406 542 636 490 2,554
Claimants within groups 22,384 18,240 22,254 24,680 18,944 106,502
Figure 1: Employee-led individual early conciliation cases by track from April 2023 to June 2024. A visual representation of the data in tables 1a to 1e.
Line chart showing quarterly volumes of employee-led early conciliation cases from individual claimants by track from April 2023 to June 2024. As outlined in Table 1 and the surrounding text.

Employer-led early conciliation notifications

Employer-led early conciliation notifications made up around 5% of early conciliation notifications in the most recent 2 quarters from January to June 2024.

Standard track cases had the largest number of employer-led notifications in all 5 quarters from April 2023 to June 2024. This has decreased from the previous quarter, accounting for 68%, compared to 74% of cases in January to March 2024. Standard track cases accounted for 67% in October to December 2023, 61% in July to September 2023, and 57% in April to June 2023.

Table 2: Employer-led individual early conciliation cases by track from April 2023 to June 2024

Track April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to  March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Fast 313 235 221 162 191 1,122
None [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed]
Open 240 223 230 234 261 1,188
Standard 735 724 934 1,119 975 4,487
Total 1,288 1,182 1,385 1,515 1,427 6,797
Figure 2: Employer-led individual early conciliation cases by track from April 2023 to June 2024. A visual representation of the data in Table 2.
Line chart showing quarterly volumes of employer-led individual early conciliation cases by track from April 2023 to June 2024. As outlined in Table 2 and the surrounding text.

3. Early conciliation notification outcomes

Some early conciliation notifications are not suitable for conciliation and the service is not mandatory so some claimants will refuse the offer.

Early conciliation cases not progressed to conciliation

In the 5 quarters from April 2023 to June 2024, just over 20% of early conciliation cases were closed without parties engaging in early conciliation. Most of these were cases with no track assigned which made up 85% of cases in April to June, up from 63% in January to March, and 59% in October to December. These are where Acas has not been able to get in touch with the claimant to gather enough information to assign a track, so this is to be expected.

Conversely, cases from all the assigned tracks that did not progress to conciliation decreased in April to June 2024 compared to the previous quarters.

It should be noted that around October 2023, changes were made to the notification form. These changes allowed users to select from more options as to the reason for their dispute. Their selection then determines the track for the case.

Fast track cases were the lowest proportion of the cases that did not progress to conciliation. Of cases with an assigned track, open track cases made up the highest proportion of cases that were not conciliated across each of the 5 quarters between April 2023 and June 2024.

Table 3: Early conciliation notifications that have not progressed to conciliation by track along with total conciliated case numbers from April 2023 to June 2024

Track April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Fast 178 153 542 475 164 1,512
None 4,381 4,623 3,285 3,549 4,519 20,357
Open 238 278 986 948 395 2,845
Standard 199 265 738 620 259 2,081
Total 4,996 5,319 5,551 5,592 5,337 26,795
Total closed 24,314 24,719 24,910 26,157 25,677 125,777
Percentage closed cases not conciliated 21% 22% 22% 21% 21% Not applicable
Figure 3: Early conciliation notifications that have not progressed to conciliation by track along with total conciliated case numbers from April 2023 to June 2024. A visual representation of the data in Table 3.
Line chart showing quarterly volumes of early conciliation notifications that have not progressed to conciliation by track from April 2023 to June 2024. As outlined in Table 3 and the surrounding text.

Settlement of early conciliation cases

Due to the potential time lag between an early conciliation certificate being issued and the corresponding ET1 reaching Acas, these data cannot be accurately reported until after a period of time has elapsed and so are one quarter behind all the other statistics in this bulletin. This table covers early conciliation, employee-led and group cases only, and is based on outcomes of cases received in April 2023 to March 2024.

Around 68% of cases did not lead to the submission of an ET1 throughout October 2023 to March 2024, falling from 69% in July to September, but up from 66% in April to June 2023. Of those with an assigned track, the fast track cases were most likely not to progress to ET1. The proportion of cases that did not progress to tribunal increased for all cases with an assigned track in April to June 2024 compared to the previous quarter.

Table 4a: Fast track early conciliation notifications by outcome of cases received from April 2023 to March 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 974 1,055 1,003 1,059 4,091
ET1 avoided 5,310 5,643 5,486 5,672 22,111
Percentage did not progress to tribunal 74% 79% 75% 78% Not applicable

Table 4b: Open track early conciliation notifications by outcome of cases received from April 2023 to March 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 1,171 1,252 1,229 1,341 4,993
ET1 avoided 4,736 5,256 5,253 5,854 21,099
Percentage did not progress to tribunal 55% 64% 57% 65% Not applicable

Table 4c: Standard track early conciliation notifications by outcome of cases received from April 2023 to March 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 802 841 839 943 3,425
ET1 avoided 3,018 3,310 3,248 3,581 13,157
Percentage did not progress to tribunal 58% 70% 61% 69% Not applicable

Table 4d: Early conciliation notifications not assigned a track by outcome of cases received from April 2023 to March 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 Total
Settled by Acas [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed]
ET1 avoided 2,551 2,859 2,907 2,980 11,297
Percentage did not progress to tribunal 99% 60% 99% 60% Not applicable

Table 4e: Total number of early conciliation notifications by outcome of cases received from April 2023 to March 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 2,947 3,148 3,071 3,343 12,509
ET1 avoided 15,615 17,068 16,894 18,087 67,664
Percentage did not progress to tribunal 66% 69% 68% 68% Not applicable

4. Employment tribunal claim form (ET1) receipts

If a case is not resolved by early conciliation, the claimant can submit an ET1 form to make a claim to an employment tribunal. Conciliation can also be carried out at this stage to try to resolve the case without progressing to tribunal.

The highest level of ET1 receipts was received in open track cases, accounting for around 50% of all ET1 receipts in each of the 5 quarters between April 2023 and June 2024. The lowest proportion of ET1 receipts was received in cases with no track assigned, accounting for less than 1% of all ET1 receipts in each of the 5 quarters between April 2023 and June 2024.

Table 5: Employment tribunal claim receipts from April 2023 to June 2024

Track April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Fast 2,201 1,905 1,827 2,073 1,739 9,745
None 34 [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] 66 100
Open 4,401 3,872 3,676 4,536 4,200 20,685
Standard 2,431 2,077 2,028 2,423 2,120 11,079
Total 9,067 7,854 7,531 9,032 8,125 41,609
Figure 4: Employment tribunal claim receipts from April 2023 to June 2024. A visual representation of the data in Table 5.
Line chart showing quarterly volume of employment tribunal claim receipts from April 2023 to June 2024. As outlined in Table 5 and the surrounding text.

5. Employment tribunal claims outcomes

These data are based on cases that had an outcome within the quarters covered in this bulletin and do not correspond to the cases that were received in Table 5.

78% of all employment tribunal cases in April to June 2024 did not progress to a tribunal hearing, up from 76% across each of the quarters between April 2023 and March 2024. Of cases with an assigned track, open track cases were most likely to not progress to a hearing, with fast track cases most likely to progress to a hearing. Acas settled around 71% of the cases that did not progress to tribunal in April to June 2024, up slightly from 70% in January to March 2024, but down from 73% in October to December 2023. This figure was 69% in July to September 2023, and 73% in April to June 2023. The remaining cases were withdrawn.

Table 6a: Fast track employment tribunal cases with outcomes reached from April 2023 to June 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 645 732 640 682 597 3,296
Withdrawn 403 466 401 417 394 2,081
Percentage did not have a hearing 62% 61% 61% 58% 63% Not applicable

Table 6b: Open track employment tribunal cases with outcomes reached from April 2023 to June 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 2,194 2,160 2,373 2,219 2,236 11,182
Withdrawn 705 838 718 863 851 3,975
Percentage did not have a hearing 84% 85% 85% 85% 86% Not applicable

Table 6c: Standard track employment tribunal cases with outcomes reached from April 2023 to June 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 1,034 977 1,075 1,030 999 5,115
Withdrawn 343 415 411 387 340 1,896
Percentage did not have a hearing 74% 71% 73% 74% 73% Not applicable

Table 6d: Employment tribunal cases not assigned a track with outcomes reached from April 2023 to June 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Settled by Acas [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed]
Withdrawn [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed]
Percentage did not have a hearing [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed] [suppressed]

Table 6e: Total number of employment tribunal cases with outcomes reached from April 2023 to June 2024

Outcome April to June 2023 July to September 2023 October to December 2023 January to March 2024 April to June 2024 Total
Settled by Acas 3,873 3,869 4,088 3,931 3,832 19,593
Withdrawn 1,451 1,719 1,530 1,667 1,585 7,952
Percentage did not have a hearing 76% 76% 76% 76% 78% Not applicable

6. Glossary

Conciliation or conciliating

The process of negotiation when an Acas conciliator mediates between parties in an employment dispute to try and reach agreement without going to an employment tribunal.

Conciliator

A government official employed by Acas who mediates or conciliates between parties in an employment dispute.

Early conciliation

Acas service introduced in April 2014. Voluntary process of conciliating before a formal employment tribunal claim has been submitted with the aim of resolving the case. The prospective claimant submits an early conciliation notification to Acas, usually online, and Acas will then offer them early conciliation.

Early conciliation notification

Submission to Acas (usually online) required to begin conciliation.

Employment tribunal (ET)

Court of law charged with hearing cases within employment jurisdictions, although cases with monetary value may be heard elsewhere.

ET1

Form used by claimants to make a claim to an employment tribunal. The form is copied to Acas to allow ET1 conciliation to proceed until either the dispute is resolved, or a legal judgement is reached. It’s free to submit an ET1.

ET1 avoided

Disputes that, at the time of publication, had led to an early conciliation notification but an ET1 had not been submitted.

Post ET1 conciliation

Acas has a duty to attempt conciliation between the claimant and their employer once an ET1 has been submitted and passed to Acas. If a settlement can be reached or if the claimant agrees to withdraw their claim, the dispute is considered to be resolved. Otherwise, it will proceed to an employment tribunal hearing.

Group case

Cases which have been grouped together for conciliation because they are against the same employer and relate to the same dispute. 'Claimants in groups' are the number of claimants represented by these group claims.

Jurisdiction

Legal classification of the type of dispute a claim is made about. One case may contain more than one jurisdiction. For example, an unfair dismissal claim may also contain a claim under the Wages Act for unpaid wages. This could be changed in an employment tribunal.

Live case

Early conciliation notifications or ET1s still going through the conciliation process.

Track

How Acas loosely classes the complexity of each case, based on the jurisdictions in the ET1 form, or the suggested jurisdictions assigned to early conciliation notifications.

The 4 tracks are:

  • fast track – straightforward cases mostly relating to money, such as unpaid wages
  • standard track – cases that are more complicated than fast track and involve unfair dismissal or a related jurisdiction
  • open track – the most legally complex cases with at least one type of discrimination or disclosure jurisdiction
  • no track assigned – cases where insufficient information is available to assign indicative jurisdictions (for example, where parties cannot be contacted)

7. Quality

You can find more information in the methodology article and background quality reports on: 

  • strengths in the data
  • limitations of the data
  • appropriate uses of the data
  • how the data were created